I am a PhD candidate in Economics at the London School of Economics, where I am affiliated with
STICERD.
I work primarily in political economy, at the intersection with labour and development economics.
I study how interactions between the state and external actors shape public sector effectiveness, and how values influences people's choices in the labour market.
Funding: STICERD, Hayek, and Phelan US Centre grants at LSE
We link U.S. patent and inventor records to individual voter register files and map politically polarized policy issues to related technologies. Compared to Republicans, Democrats are one-third more likely to patent technologies addressing climate-change mitigation or women’s reproductive health, and one-third less likely to patent weapons and related technologies. These gaps are not explained by differences in inventive ability or by sorting across organizations or teams. Party-technology alignment has strengthened over the past two decades, a period of rising political polarization in U.S. society. Technology diffusion is also politically polarized: Democrats are more likely than Republicans to cite aligned technologies and less likely to cite misaligned ones. Together, these findings are consistent with political polarization and societal views being important drivers of the direction and diffusion of technological change and operating, at least in part, through inventors’ technology choices, with implications for innovation policy.
How does identity affect occupational choice? We study this question in the energy
labor market, as oil and gas firms play a fundamental role in the green transition. We
design and administer a survey experiment to job seekers entering the labor market for
the first time. We find that individuals assign positive amenity value to working for a
company whose core business aligns with their environmental identity and disamenity
value to those that conflict with it. Respondents with green identities are willing to
forgo 20% of their salary to work in a renewable energy firm rather than a generic
energy company, and require a 15% wage premium to accept a job in an oil and gas
firm. This pattern also holds when individuals apply to work in teams focusing on clean
energy within these firms. To isolate social-image effects, we randomize whether job
choices are private or publicly disclosed. Social image concerns significantly influence
occupational choices, especially for jobs perceived as socially stigmatized. We develop
a model of occupational choice in which individuals have private preferences over jobs
and derive utility from aligning with social norms. In structural simulations, we study
how the social environment shapes labor market inequality and the pace of the green
transition.