I am a PhD candidate in economics at the London School of Economics.

My research interests are in political, public, and labour economics. I study how public and private organisations allocate talent and resources, and how views, values and norms influence organisational and labour market decisions.

I will be on the 2026–2027 academic job market.

Job Market Paper

Make or Buy the State? Consulting in the Public Sector

funders

Google Cloud Research, Programme on Cohesive Capitalism, and STICERD

presentations

BSE Summer Forum; LSE Department of Economics; LSE POID Seminar; LSE Department of Government

Working Papers

slides paper
funders

STICERD, Hayek Programme, and Phelan US Centre

presentations

BSE Summer Forum; IEB Workshop on Political Economy; UniCredit Marco Fanno Alumni Workshop; Environmental Populism Conference; NICEP Conference; LSE Department of Government; LSE Department of Economics; Hayek Workshop on Institutions and Political Economy in Historical Perspective; Society for Economic Dynamics Annual Meeting; EEA-ESEM Annual Congress; ASREC Europe Conference; Bristol Economics of Innovation Workshop; Lewis Lab Graduate Student Workshop; LSE POID Seminar

| with Gaia Dossi
We study whether, and how, societal views about which problems are most important or worth solving are reflected in the direction of technological progress. Compared to Republican inventors, Democrats are more likely to patent technologies addressing climate-change mitigation or women’s reproductive health and less likely to patent weapons. These gaps are not explained by differences in inventive ability, persist within organizations, have strengthened over the past two decades, and also appear in subsequent innovation. Together, societal views and their polarization appear to be important drivers of technological change, operating in part through inventors’ technology choices, with implications for innovation policy.

The Geography of Development Programs

funders

STICERD

presentations

LSE Department of Economics; IFS/STICERD/UCL Development Work in Progress Seminar; Warwick-LSE Political Economy Conference; World Bank 11th Urbanization and Development Conference*; Yale Y-Rise Conference 2026*
* scheduled

| with Beyza Gulmezoglu and Eddy Zou
International organisations devote substantial resources to reaching the poorest segments of the population. Yet we know little about how these resources are distributed and why. In this paper, we provide the first systematic evidence on where development programs go within countries. We assemble a new dataset linking roughly 5,000 geocoded World Bank projects across 130 countries since 1995 to district-level nighttime lights and complete records of the personnel assigned to each project. We find that aid flows disproportionately to richer areas: 51% of World Bank projects exhibit positive “site selection,” landing in districts significantly richer than their neighbours in the same province. In contrast, only about one-third of World Bank projects are targeted to poorer districts. The pattern is pervasive across sectors and is not explained by population-based targeting. It does not reflect a gain in performance: projects in richer areas are no more successful according to the World Bank’s own independent ratings. Supply-side factors related to World Bank personnel help explain where projects are located. World Bank project managers, who have substantial discretion over choosing project locations, account for a sizeable share of the total variation in site selection, more than year, sector, and country fixed effects combined. We unpack the role of career incentives, managerial skills, and learning in driving site selection. These findings suggest that where aid goes within countries is shaped not only by the needs of the recipient country but also by the organizational structure of the agencies that deliver it.

The Cost of Identity: Theory and Evidence from the Energy Labour Market

funders

STICERD and Global School of Sustainability

presentations

LSE Department of Economics

| with Gaia Dossi and Matthew OBrien

Work in Progress

A Guide on How to Interview with AI

AI-led interviews are a key tool for understanding people’s views and reasoning at scale. This paper provides guidance on when and how to use them in online surveys, highlighting their potential benefits and costs.

Other Writing

Teaching